ArticlePhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2026
Reproducibility of the 6-Minute Step Test in Individuals on Hemodialysis.
Article in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFunctional impairments are common in individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis (HD); however, the clinical assessment of physical function remains challenging due to the limited availability of simple and reliable functional tests validated for this population. PURPOSE: To evaluate the test-retest reproducibility of the 6-minute step test (6MST) in individuals undergoing HD, including the interpretation of measurement error.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional, test retest- reliability study conducted in patients receiving maintenance HD. All assessments were performed immediately before the HD session. Participants completed the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item Short Form questionnaire (KDQOL SF-36) and performed two 6MSTs under standardized conditions. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute reliability was evaluated through the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Agreement between tests was examined using Bland-Altman analysis.
resultsFifty patients completed both test sessions. The 6MST demonstrated good test-retest reliability for total steps (ICC = 0.80), with most differences between tests remaining below the MDC95, indicating the absence of a clinically meaningful learning effect. Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias and acceptable limits of agreement for both total steps and heart rate measured at the sixth minute of the test. Physiological responses, including oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and perceived exertion, remained stable between sessions. DISCUSSION: The 6 minute step test is a reliable and clinically applicable tool for assessing functional capacity in individuals undergoing hemodialysis. The absence of a relevant learning effect and the stability of physiological responses support its use for functional assessment and follow-up, even when performed before the hemodialysis session. Further studies should investigate inter-rater reproducibility and responsiveness to interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.