Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479829›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Integrated thermal and phytoremediation of agricultural soils impacted by PFAS.

Jake T Thompson, Millie Dobson, Tim Jesper Suhrhoff, Yoshiki Kanzaki, Chloe Kent, Lucinda Bryce, Ella Milliken, Christopher T Reinhard, Yuan Yao, Noah Planavsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jake T ThompsonDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0009-0004-1767-4543
Millie DobsonSchool of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom.
Tim Jesper SuhrhoffYale Center for Natural Carbon Capture, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0002-7934-7159
Yoshiki KanzakiSchool of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-1736
Chloe KentDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Lucinda BryceDepartment of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.
Ella MillikenDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0009-0005-6996-3694
Christopher T ReinhardSchool of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.ORCID 0000-0002-2632-1027
Yuan YaoCenter for Industrial Ecology, Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06514.ORCID 0000-0001-9359-2030
Noah PlanavskyDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0001-5849-8508

Funding

Schmidt Family Foundation (SFF) G-25-68435UKRI | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/S007210/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent synthetic compounds that have contaminated millions of hectares of agricultural land through decades of biosolids application. Conventional remediation approaches, such as thermal destruction or excavation, are prohibitively expensive, carbon intensive, and leave affected farmland unfit for agriculture. Here, we present a potential scalable remediation strategy that combines phytoremediation, biochar production, and enhanced weathering to simultaneously remove PFAS from soil, immobilize residual contamination, and achieve durable carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Using stochastic modeling constrained by experimental data, we show that soil pH management through alkaline rock amendment can accelerate PFOS removal, shortening remediation timelines by more than a decade under typical contamination levels. Pyrolysis of harvested biomass effectively destroys PFAS and produces biochar, which, when reapplied to soil, substantially reduces leaching to groundwater and the surrounding environment. National-scale simulations across the estimated one million hectares of PFAS-impacted cropland indicate a combined CDR potential of approximately 11 Mt CO

Indexed as

AgricultureAlkanesulfonic AcidsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalFluorocarbonsSoilSoil PollutantsCarbon DioxideCharcoalAlkanesulfonic AcidsbiocharCarbon DioxideCharcoalFluorocarbonsSoilSoil Pollutantsbiocharenhanced weatheringPFOAPFOSplant-uptake

Identifiers

PMID42479829
PMCPMC13416631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.