ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Coordinative structures as scale-free networks: Cascade and percolation dynamics in motor learning with empirical validation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coordinative structures are the functional groupings of degrees of freedom that simplify motor control. Decades of research have documented them well, yet they remain mechanistically unexplained. How they emerge and why they are hierarchically organized are both unresolved questions. This study proposes scale-free network topology as the missing mechanism. Systematic simulations compared random networks, small-world networks, and scale-free networks. Scale-free organization reproduced the defining features of coordinative structures more completely than either alternative. Those features are a hub-periphery hierarchy, ordered hub-first recruitment, an abrupt onset of global coordination, and a balance between stability and flexibility. Four formal correspondences connect these features to established coordination phenomena. A coupled learning model reproduced the characteristic curve of skill acquisition, and scale-free networks reached the coordination threshold fastest. The model was then validated against published data from five independent studies spanning motor learning, bimanual coordination, brain networks, and joint coordination. It yields eleven testable predictions with explicit quantitative thresholds, together with five criteria that would disconfirm it. Network topology therefore offers a principled account of how coordinative structures form through structural constraints and experience. That account is empirically grounded and open to falsification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.