ArticlePloS one2026
Comparing token-based and trajectory-based vowel space metrics for assessing speech in Parkinson's disease.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assessed the ability of three acoustic measures of vowel space, two token-based and one trajectory-based, to quantify speech differences in people with Parkinson's disease compared to controls and correlations with speech intelligibility. Fifty-six speakers (28 people with Parkinson's and 28 controls) read a custom reading passage containing corner vowels. For token-based measures, the triangular vowel space area (tVSA) in kHz2 and the unitless ratio of vowel articulation index (VAI) were calculated. For the trajectory-based measure, the articulatory-acoustic vowel space (AAVS) in kHz2 was calculated. Speakers also read five unique sentences varying in word length, which were used to collect speech intelligibility ratings. Analyses of Variance revealed that all vowel space measures yielded group differences. Binary logistic regression revealed that only the token-based measures were able to statistically discriminate PwPD from controls, however all models performed poorly (R2 < 0.113). Linear regressions showed that token-based metrics were statistically related to intelligibility and that the VAI yielded the best model for the current sample. The results support that token-based measures are well-suited for quantifying changes in acoustic vowel space and perceived speech intelligibility in people with Parkinson's. Future work should examine the generalizability of these findings to other motor speech disorders as well as across different speech stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.