ArticlePLOS digital health2026
An exploratory mixed-methods assessment of private health sector readiness for reporting through the Ministry of Health and Child Care Health Information System in Zimbabwe.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zimbabwe's healthcare system is a blend of public and private sectors, yet a substantial gap remains in integrating private-sector data into the Ministry of Health and Child Care's (MoHCC) Health Information System (HIS) to achieve a comprehensive national picture. This exploratory descriptive cross-sectional study used a mixed methods approach to assess the organisational readiness of Zimbabwe's private healthcare sector for reporting through MoHCC HIS. The key facilitators and barriers influencing the successful integration of private healthcare data into MoHCC HIS. Data were collected through an online survey (n = 49), and an interview guide was used to conduct in-depth interviews (n = 24) with private health facilities stakeholders using constructs such as structural readiness, technological readiness, resource availability, and skill and knowledge readiness. Informed written consent was obtained from the participants for the in-depth interviews. Ethical approval was granted by the Joint Research Ethics Committee JREC/438/2024. Epi Info 7 was used for calculating frequencies and proportions for the quantitative data. Thematic analysis was done for the qualitative data. The private sector was partially ready to report through the MoHCC HIS, as evidenced by facilities' willingness and leadership commitment to report, the availability of infrastructure, and the presence of data management systems. The study highlights potential facilitators such as enhancing technological readiness, improving staff training, and fostering stronger communication between the public and private sectors. Key challenges identified include inadequate legal frameworks supporting mandatory reporting and limited resources within private facilities. This assessment provides vital information for integrating private sector health data into Zimbabwe's national Health Information System. Addressing existing gaps and leveraging identified facilitators, stakeholders can enhance the quality of health data available for policy planning and resource allocation, ultimately improving health outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.