Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479710›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Enhancing the sustainability of cultural identity in science curricula through artificial intelligence as an innovative educational approach.

Jawaher Alrashood, Omayya Al-Hassan, Sarah Alotaibi, Tahani Alrosaa, Rommel AlAli, Ali Al-Barakat, Abdelrahim Ismail, Yusra Aboud, Ali Abdullatif, Ashraf Zaher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jawaher AlrashoodDepartment of Teaching and Learning, College of Education and Human Development, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Omayya Al-HassanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, College of Education, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Sarah AlotaibiDepartment of Teaching and Learning, College of Education and Human Development, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tahani AlrosaaDepartment of Teaching and Learning, College of Education and Human Development, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rommel AlAliThe National Research Center for Giftedness and Creativity, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-4856
Ali Al-BarakatDepartment of Education, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Abdelrahim IsmailDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Yusra AboudThe National Research Center for Giftedness and Creativity, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AbdullatifDepartment of Arabic Language, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Ashraf ZaherTranslation, Authorship and Publication Center, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the role of AI as an innovative educational approach in promoting the sustainability of cultural identity within science curricula. To achieve this aim, a qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews and classroom observations as primary data collection methods. The study sample consisted of forty-seven science teachers from the Al-Qassim and Al-Ahsa regions in Saudi Arabia, selected purposively based on their experience with technology-enhanced instruction. The collected data were analyzed using systematic qualitative procedures involving open and axial coding, which facilitated the emergence of key categories related to AI integration, cultural relevance, and instructional practices. Accordingly, the analytical process is best understood as an inductive thematic qualitative approach rather than a full grounded theory methodology, as it does not include theoretical sampling, data saturation, or iterative cycles of data collection. This clarification ensures methodological transparency and alignment between design and analysis. Findings derived from both teachers' perceptions and classroom observations indicate that AI is not perceived merely as a tool for knowledge transmission, but rather as a supportive instructional mechanism that enables the contextualization of scientific concepts within local cultural settings. In addition, AI-supported instructional practices appear to foster more interactive and collaborative classroom environments, while also contributing to more responsive approaches to assessment. However, it is important to emphasize that these findings are based on teachers' reported perceptions and observed instructional practices rather than direct measurement of student learning outcomes. Despite this limitation, classroom observations suggest that integrating culturally relevant examples, analyzing cultural texts, and designing collaborative, culturally responsive learning activities may enhance student engagement and strengthen their connection to cultural identity within science learning contexts. Overall, the study highlights the potential of AI to bridge scientific knowledge and local cultural heritage in science education. It contributes to the growing body of literature on AI in education by emphasizing its role in fostering culturally responsive pedagogy and enhancing meaningful learning experiences. The study further underscores the importance of providing teachers with targeted professional development in AI integration, developing culturally responsive instructional materials, and designing assessment practices that address both conceptual understanding and cultural dimensions of learning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCurriculumScienceHumansQualitative ResearchSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID42479710
PMCPMC13387527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.