ArticlePloS one2026
Associations between self-reported symptoms and circulating protein biomarkers: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies linking self-reported symptoms to circulating protein biomarkers are increasing, partly driven by the rising number of protein biomarkers being identified. Despite research advances, current reviews that synthesise these studies are typically disease-specific. A broader, diagnosis-agnostic and multidisciplinary scoping review can uncover shared biological patterns associated with symptoms across different conditions and can generate insights that advance precision health and symptom science. This scoping review protocol builds on this need for a broad approach as it aims to consolidate current knowledge on self-reported symptom and circulating protein biomarker associations, identify potential patterns, and provide relevant insights for clinical practice and future research.
methodsThe protocol is aligned with the PRISMA and JBI guidelines for scoping reviews. The search strategy includes original peer-reviewed journal research articles examining associations between self-reported symptoms and protein biomarkers in blood plasma or serum. Searches will be conducted from PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A preliminary search retrieved more than 30,000 articles, prompting a pilot test of the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted review screening tool ASReview. The pilot demonstrated time savings, refined methodological decisions, and confirmed the feasibility of proceeding with the review. Therefore, screening will be conducted using ASReview, with a total of five reviewers involved in the process. Data extraction will focus on single self-reported symptoms and circulating protein biomarker pairs that have a reported association. Analysis will involve counting and mapping these associations to identify potential patterns. The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) https://osf.io/bku3f. DISCUSSION: This protocol provides a structured and transparent approach for conducting a large-scale scoping review. By adhering to established guidelines, the protocol provides a more comprehensive, standardised, exact, and reproducible accumulation of knowledge, while acknowledging potential limitations. The expected results can contribute to summarise the current understanding of associations between self-reported symptoms and circulating protein biomarkers. This fosters the integration of symptom science and the omics field, specifically proteomics, to advance precision health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.