ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Third-Redo Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Recurrent Anastomotic Stones: A Video-Based Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Redo surgery after Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is technically demanding due to dense intra-abdominal adhesions and distorted anatomy. Repeated laparoscopic reoperations for recurrent biliary stones remain rarely reported, especially in patients undergoing multiple revisions. This study presents a video-based case highlighting technical strategies for a third laparoscopic redo hepaticojejunostomy. CASE REPORT A 41-year-old woman with a history of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy presented with recurrent biliary stones, most likely secondary to progressive anastomotic stricture leading to bile stasis. She had previously undergone 2 laparoscopic revisions due to early recurrence. Imaging revealed a large filling defect above the previous anastomosis. A third laparoscopic exploration was performed. Severe adhesions were carefully dissected, and the previous anastomosis was identified with the assistance of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. The impacted stone was removed, and intraoperative choledochoscopy confirmed complete clearance of the intrahepatic bile ducts. Reconstruction was performed using interrupted 4-0 polydioxanone sutures with a mucosa-to-mucosa technique, ensuring a wide and tension-free anastomosis to reduce the risk of restenosis. The postoperative course was uneventful. During the 6-month follow-up period, she remained asymptomatic without episodes of cholangitis or jaundice, and imaging confirmed a patent anastomosis with no evidence of stone recurrence. CONCLUSIONS A third laparoscopic redo hepaticojejunostomy can be feasible in carefully selected patients. Adequate anastomotic diameter, meticulous adhesiolysis, and precise identification of the previous anastomosis are critical to minimizing recurrence. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging can be a useful adjunct in complex redo biliary surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.