ReviewOncology2026
Practical Guide for Managing Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Patients with Organ Dysfunction.
Review in Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClassical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis, frequently occur in patients with renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, or hematologic comorbidities. These vulnerabilities complicate treatment selection, dose adjustment, and toxicity monitoring. However, patients with advanced kidney disease, dialysis dependence, decompensated cirrhosis, severe cytopenias, or overlapping organ impairment are often underrepresented in prospective trials. SUMMARY: This narrative review presents a practical, organ-adapted framework for selecting MPN therapy in clinically complex patients. We define renal and hepatic impairment, compare commonly used cytoreductive and targeted therapies, including hydroxyurea, busulfan, anagrelide, ruxolitinib, fedratinib, momelotinib, pacritinib, ropeginterferon alfa-2b, and pegylated interferon alfa-2a, and discuss their use in dialysis, decompensated liver disease, cytopenic myelofibrosis, anemia-dominant myelofibrosis, and combined organ vulnerability. The proposed approach prioritizes label-based dose modification when available, cautious dose initiation when evidence is extrapolated, structured early monitoring, and multidisciplinary review for high-risk patients. KEY MESSAGES: Management of Philadelphia-negative MPNs in organ dysfunction should be individualized according to disease phenotype, treatment goal, organ reserve, hematologic tolerance, frailty, and label-specific safety restrictions. In renal impairment, hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib may remain feasible in selected patients when dose-adjusted and monitored closely, whereas dialysis and severe renal impairment require conservative initiation and multidisciplinary review because direct evidence remains limited. In myelofibrosis, JAK inhibitor choice should be phenotype-adapted; ruxolitinib remains a common standard when blood counts and organ function permit, momelotinib is attractive in anemia-dominant disease, pacritinib is particularly relevant in severe thrombocytopenia, and fedratinib is useful in selected settings but requires thiamine-focused safety management. In hepatic dysfunction or overlapping organ vulnerability, therapy should prioritize safety, reversible contributors, conservative starting strategies, explicit stopping rules, and early reassessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.