ArticlePloS one2026
Lateral similarity and symmetry of biometric data from the LenStar in a population with cataract.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the similarity and symmetry of biometric measures between eyes in a large dataset of measurements of both eyes taken with the LenStar optical biometer.
methodsCross-sectional non-randomised study evaluating a dataset containing 13,420 bilateral LenStar 900 biometric measurements on patients without history of eye surgery or ocular pathology taken before cataract surgery, consisting of scalar parameters axial length AL, corneal thickness CCT, anterior chamber depth ACD, lens thickness LT and corneal diameter WTW. The keratometric power vector components equivalent power KEQ were assessed for similarity, and the projections of corneal astigmatism vector KC0 and KC45 were analysed for direct and mirror symmetry with respect to the vertical (sagittal) plane.
resultsMean / standard deviation (squared correlation coefficient) difference between right and left eye measures was 0.02 ± 0.31(0.95) / 0.00 ± 0.01(0.93) / 0.00 ± 0.14(0.88) / -0.01 ± 0.22(0.78) / -0.02 ± 0.17(0.87) mm for AL / CCT / ACD / LT / WTW and -0.06 ± 0.48(0.92) dioptres for KEQ. Keratometric astigmatism showed a high degree of mirror symmetry (KC45 of left eyes inverted in sign) which outperforms direct symmetry. The median deviation of the keratometric axes of both eyes considering mirror symmetry was 15 degrees compared to 29 degrees for direct symmetry.
conclusionsIn most cases, biometric measures match between eyes of a subject, but there are rare situations with large deviations between eyes. Keratometric astigmatism exhibits mirror symmetry. In most cases the biometric measures from the contralateral eye could be used where biometry is unavailable or to double-check before cataract surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.