Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479622›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026

Predicting PFAS Exposure Risks from Rural Private Wells Using Integrated Mechanistic and Machine-Learned Bayesian Network Models.

Hana Chmielewski Long, Rohit Warrier, Krishna Ganta, Riley Mulhern, Ted Lillys, Jennifer Hoponick Redmon, Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hana Chmielewski LongDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina27695-7908, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0363-3212
Rohit WarrierResearch Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina27709-2194, United States.
Krishna GantaDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina27695-7908, United States.
Riley MulhernDepartment of Environmental Studies, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado80303-0397, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6293-3672
Ted LillysResearch Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina27709-2194, United States.
Jennifer Hoponick RedmonResearch Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina27709-2194, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5655-3737
Jacqueline MacDonald GibsonDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina27695-7908, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5468-0713

Funding

EPA 84008102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pose complex challenges for drinking water management, particularly in rural communities reliant on private wells that fall outside federal regulatory oversight. As regulators and communities grapple with evolving standards and limited resources, there is a critical need for scalable, accurate, and resource-efficient models to assess PFAS exposure risks. This study compares traditional mechanistic groundwater models to machine-learned Bayesian networks and hybrid approaches that integrate both model types. Using hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid, commonly known as GenX, contamination near North Carolina's Fayetteville Works Plant as a case study, we evaluate each model's (1) ability to identify wells exceeding health-based GenX thresholds, (2) robustness to incomplete data, and (3) development and calibration time. Results demonstrate that Bayesian networks match or exceed mechanistic models in classification performance, while offering superior robustness to missing data and varying decision thresholds, along with decreased modeling resource demands. Hybrid models incorporating mechanistic outputs into Bayesian networks achieve the highest performance, showing that mechanistic insights can improve Bayesian network predictions. These findings support a flexible modeling framework that can adapt to changing regulations and emerging contaminants without recalibrating full process-based models, offering practical tools for regulators and communities to advance PFAS risk management.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsMachine LearningBayes TheoremGroundwaterNorth CarolinaWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater WellsFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBayesian networkgroundwater contaminationgroundwater modelinghybrid numerical machine learning modelmachine learningPFAS

Identifiers

PMID42479622
PMCPMC13449876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.