ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
Planning a Regional Data Ecosystem for Public Health Preparedness and Response.
Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextSiloed data impede public health preparedness and response (PHPR). Challenges in PHPR data sharing and integration hamper the development and uptake of evidence-based strategies and interventions (EBSIs) and limit public health agencies' ability to reduce risk and enhance equity.
objectiveTo develop a concept for a regional data ecosystem connecting people, platforms, and processes for better PHPR data and decision making in the region.
designWe adopted a user-centered design approach. The Community of Practice (CoP; ie, those who represent the user groups) codesigned the data ecosystem. The CoP collaborated through 4 facilitated meetings (including an all-day, in-person workshop) and 7 document reviews over 7 months. Methods included environmental scans, synchronous and asynchronous feedback from the CoP, and subject-matter expert consultations.
settingThe Northwest region of the United States, designated as the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Region 10, including 272 Tribal nations and the states of Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
participantsThe nineteen-member CoP in the region, including state, Tribal, and local public health professionals, health care coalition representatives, and researchers, and 4 subject-matter consultants (eg, in data systems infrastructure, health information exchange, public health surveillance, and response).
main outcome measuresA whitepaper outlining key findings and recommendations for the region.
resultsThis whitepaper synthesizes a list of priority recommendations concerning governance, policy, logistics, data, and infrastructure. It emphasizes fostering trust between organizations through deliberate data governance planning. It addresses the need to lower technical, legal, and staffing barriers in data integration and sharing. A 125-page Supplementary Document provides additional details, http://links.lww.com/JPHMP/B713, including 90 recommendations for the development of a data ecosystem in the region.
conclusionFostering trust through codesign has been identified as central to the ecosystem development. The recommendations remain to be implemented and evaluated, contingent upon funding availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.