ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Fluorine Mass Balance in Swedish Sludge and the Impact of Sample Treatment on Extractable Organofluorine.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are an extensive group of anthropogenic compounds with a large diversity of classes. Relying only on target analysis may underestimate the level of PFAS contamination in the environment. The extractable organofluorine (EOF) mass balance is a widely applied method to estimate the fraction of organofluorine not captured by target analysis. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive EOF mass balance analysis on sludge and evaluate the impact of three different sample treatments on target PFAS and EOF, as well as their respective mass balance. Two complementary sample treatments were applied to 26 Swedish sludge samples: ion-pair extraction (IPE) for anionic and neutral PFAS, and hexane:acetone extraction (Hx:Ac) for nonpolar PFAS. The results demonstrated that the EOF concentrations were highly influenced by the sample treatment. The IPE method observed up to 40 times higher EOF concentrations than the Hx:Ac method, indicating a high proportion of polar organofluorine. Unidentified EOF increased between 2004 and 2017 for both sample treatments. These findings demonstrate that both polar and nonpolar organofluorine contribute to the EOF and that no single method captures them. In the present study, only two side-chain fluorinated copolymers were monitored, and other fluorinated polymers may be contributors to the unknown EOF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.