ArticleJAMA network open2026
Screening Eligibility and Survival Among Patients With Lung Cancer in Korea.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Lung cancer screening has demonstrated survival benefits among heavy smokers, forming the basis of current age- and smoking intensity-based eligibility criteria. However, applicability of these criteria in Asia remains uncertain, where many cases occur outside current criteria, including among persons with no smoking history. Objective: To evaluate the proportions, characteristics, and survival outcomes of Korean patients with lung cancer according to international screening eligibility. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, population-based cohort study included individuals newly diagnosed with lung cancer in Korea between 2013 and 2018, prior to implementation of the national lung cancer screening program. Participants were followed up until December 31, 2021. Patients were classified as meeting the 2023 American Cancer Society screening eligibility criteria (aged 50-80 years with a smoking history of ≥20 pack-years [PY]) were compared with individuals with less than 20 PY, and persons with no smoking history within the same age range. Data were analyzed from August to December 2025. Exposures: Age and smoking intensity in PY. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Lung cancer-specific mortality was evaluated as a secondary outcome. Results: Of 89 860 patients with lung cancer (mean [SD] age at diagnosis 67.8 [10.2]; 63 003 [70.1%] male), 31 804 (35.4%) met screening eligibility criteria, 39 627 (44.1%) had no smoking history, and 4232 (4.7%) were aged younger than 50 years. Among individuals aged 50 to 80 years, screening eligibility differed markedly by sex, with 31 277 men (56.8%) and 527 women (2.3%) meeting the screening criteria. Distant metastatic disease was present in 13 023 patients (40.9%) in the screening-eligible group, 5233 patients (41.1%) with less than 20 PY, and 12 192 patients (36.9%) with no smoking history. Compared with the screening-eligible group, risks of both all-cause and lung cancer-specific mortality were significantly lower among individuals with less than 20 PY of smoking (all-cause mortality: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98; lung cancer-specific mortality: adjusted subdistribution HR [aSHR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99) and individuals with no smoking history (all-cause mortality: aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88; lung cancer-specific mortality: aSHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88) aged 50 to 80 years. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Korean patients with lung cancer, international screening guidelines excluded 64.6% of patients, a substantial proportion of whom had no smoking history. Ineligible patients had lower mortality risk than screening-eligible patients. These findings suggest that population-specific strategies are needed to improve early detection among individuals not captured by current screening criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.