Observational studyJAMA network open2026
Troponin Screening and Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Troponin monitoring is recommended for the early detection of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated myocarditis, but its utility as a universal screening tool for all cardiovascular (CV) toxic effects in patients with cancer treated with ICIs remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate whether systematic troponin screening is associated with reduced major adverse CV events (MACEs) and mortality in patients receiving ICI therapy for cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study assessed adults treated with ICIs between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, at 2 tertiary oncology centers. Patients undergoing systematic troponin screening (≥2 measurements during the first trimester of ICI therapy not prompted by symptoms) were compared with those undergoing clinical assessment without screening. Cross-sectional follow-up was undertaken between June 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024. Exposure: ICI therapy for solid cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes included adjudicated MACEs (ICI-associated myocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure requiring hospitalization, sudden cardiac death, and CV death). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression, Fine-Gray competing risk models, and propensity score matching were applied, with death from cancer considered a competing risk. Results: Of 859 patients (mean [SD] age, 70.1 [10.8] years; 517 [60.2%] male; 585 [68.1%] with lung cancer), 40 (4.7%) developed MACEs, including 6 (0.7%) with ICI-associated myocarditis; 484 (56.3%) died at a median follow-up of 3.3 (IQR, 1.3-7.2) months, mainly from cancer (436 [90.1%]). Routine troponin screening was associated with lower mortality combined with MACEs in multivariable models (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.45-0.70]) (P < .001) but was not associated with MACEs after competitive risk analysis (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.20-1.55]) (P = .27) or in a propensity score-matched cohort of 354 patients (hazard ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.20-1.24]) (P = .13). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, systematic troponin screening was not associated with MACEs in an older population with metastatic solid cancer after competitive risk analysis or propensity score matching. These findings suggest that the benefits of universal troponin monitoring are questionable among unselected patients with cancer who are receiving ICIs; further investigation is needed to determine whether risk-adapted screening improves outcomes while avoiding unnecessary interruptions of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.