ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Clinical and Economic Burden of Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries.
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and Economic Burden of Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis retrospective cohort study described clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU), and costs among Medicare beneficiaries with or without obesity and stratified by cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing Medicare FFS claims (Jan 2016-Dec 2022), beneficiaries were indexed after 12 months of continuous enrollment and followed until death, disenrollment, or study end (≥ 12 months continuous enrollment post-index required for HCRU and cost analyses). Outcomes were compared between beneficiaries with obesity (class ≥ 1: diagnosis/BMI ≥ 30; class ≥ 3: severe/morbid obesity/BMI ≥ 40) versus without obesity, and stratified by CVD risk (established, at-risk and low-risk). Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using Cox models, and HCRU and costs using generalised linear models and two-part models, all adjusted for baseline covariates.
resultsA total of 21 306 251 beneficiaries were included in the study. Hazard ratios for clinical outcomes were higher among those with obesity versus without obesity, particularly for heart failure-associated hospitalisation (class ≥ 1: 1.92; class ≥ 3: 3.40), type 2 diabetes (class ≥ 1: 1.65; class ≥ 3: 2.20) and MACE-5 (class ≥ 1: 1.44; class ≥ 3: 2.27). Total costs (per-patient per-month $; cost ratio) were higher among those with obesity class ≥ 1 ($4113 vs. $2876; 1.43), and obesity class ≥ 3 ($5319 vs. $2929; 1.82), driven by high outpatient and inpatient utilisation. Results were consistent across CVD risk stratifications.
conclusionThese findings highlight the higher risk of negative clinical outcomes and costs associated with obesity among US Medicare beneficiaries. Further research is warranted to improve treatment and prevention of obesity to mitigate risks and costs for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.