ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Examining the Association Between Violence and PrEP Use Among Indigenous Gay and Bisexual Men in Guatemala.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indigenous gay and bisexual men (GBM) in Guatemala face high rates of violence and HIV. This study seeks to understand the relationship between exposure to different forms of violence and PrEP use to inform PrEP programming in Guatemala. From June 2023- May 2024, two partner organizations administered a cross-sectional questionnaire to 395 Indigenous Guatemalan GBM. We examined the relationship between violence (physical, sexual, and police violence due to sexual orientation; forced migration and knowing someone missing, injured, or killed in the internal armed conflict; and intimate partner violence [IPV] victimization and perpetration) and PrEP use using logistic regression in R. In multivariable analysis, we found that participants who experienced police violence had 75% greater odds of PrEP use than those who did not experience police violence (aOR:1.73, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.75, p = 0.02). Participants who experienced forced migration during the internal conflict had twice the odds of being current PrEP users, (aOR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.11, 3.70, p = 0.02). Participants who perpetrated IPV had 80% lower odds of using PrEP (aOR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.65, p = 0.02). Indigenous GBM experience a high burden of violence which may affect their use of PrEP. Future longitudinal research should explore how violence victimization affects perceived HIV risk and resilience, which may explain why Indigenous GBM who experienced violence may be more likely to use PrEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42479392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.