ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
Increasing demands on commissioning and quality assurance for cone-based multiple brain metastases robotic radiosurgery: evaluation in a custom phantom.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of multiple brain metastases (MBM) using fixed cone collimation is well established. This study aims to rigorously evaluate the commissioning of MBM SRS using feasible complex clinical scenarios. Sixteen gross tumour volumes (GTVs) were contoured on the CT of an in-house developed phantom. Six treatment plans, testing different levels of complexity, were generated using the Ray Tracing (RT) dose calculation algorithm and recalculated with the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. Respective quality assurance (QA) plans were generated on the same phantom and delivered on a CyberKnife M6 system. QA was performed with EBT4 film inserted in the GTVs under investigation. The films were scanned and analysed using in-house developed software for comparison with RT and MC calculated dose distributions in the film planes. For simple cases, RT and MC performed equally well. As the number and proximity of GTVs increased, with complex GTV geometrical distribution and multiple prescription dose levels (MPDLs), the plan gamma pass rate at 3%/1 mm was 36.2% for RT compared to 96.4% for MC. Corresponding RT and MC calculated dose planes were also compared for the failing cases, and similar differences were observed. In conclusion, commissioning of the algorithm with simple and few brain metastases should not be assumed to hold for MBM SRS. The RT algorithm was found to be unsuitable for complex MBM SRS. When commissioning SRS techniques for treating multiple GTVs, the increased demands of proximity and geometrical distribution of GTVs, and the use of MPDLs, should be carefully considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.