ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026
Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation via Perturbation-Aware Mutual Learning and Edge-Aware Uncertainty Loss for Accurate Anatomical Delineation.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of medical volumes in magnetic resonance imaging is essential for the exploration of organ structures. Despite the impressive performance of supervised learning in medical image segmentation, its reliance on the large availability of labeled datasets poses a challenge due to the expertise and effort required for data acquisition. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods extract additional information from unlabeled datasets without involvement of expert annotation, and many approaches have been proposed to assist with this task. However, they often yield satisfactory results in the central regions but do not perform well in the edge regions due to low contrast edges and ambiguous tissue intensities at the boundary. Meanwhile, standard loss functions are biased towards large regions and cause under-penalizing of boundary errors. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that effectively leverages unlabeled data to improve segmentation performance in cardiac structures. Firstly, we design a mutual learning module with multiple decoders to obtain different predicted probabilities through feature perturbations. Secondly, we apply a novel consistency constraint between labeled and unlabeled data by a dual fine-grained boundary loss that provide global characteristics-based guidance from the transition of the boundary region and an edge-aware uncertainty loss. We evaluate the proposed framework on two publicly available cardiac datasets, including the automated cardiac diagnosis challenge (ACDC) dataset under a 2D setting and the left atrium (LA) dataset under a 3D setting, and compare it with seven recent state-of-the-art semi-supervised methods. Through extensive qualitative visualization and quantitative experiments under standard semi-supervised settings, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach and its superior segmentation performance compared with existing methods. Furthermore, clinically relevant cardiac measurements derived from the segmentation results are evaluated to analyze the clinical relevance of the proposed framework. To support reproducibility and future research, our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/waqasanwaar/SSL4MIS_PMEUL .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42479299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.