Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479299›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026

Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation via Perturbation-Aware Mutual Learning and Edge-Aware Uncertainty Loss for Accurate Anatomical Delineation.

Waqas Anwaar, Van Manh, Wufeng Xue, Dong Ni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Waqas AnwaarGuangdong Key Laboratory of Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0570-7109
Van ManhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Biocomputing and Digital Health, Institute of Computing and Cybernetics, Health Research Institute, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
Wufeng XueGuangdong Key Laboratory of Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China. xuewf@szu.edu.cn.
Dong NiGuangdong Key Laboratory of Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China. nidong@szu.edu.cn.

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2023- I2M-CGuangdong Natural Science Foundation 2024A1515030143internal project of National Engineering Laboratory for Big Data System Computing Technology SZU-BDSC-IF2024-02National Natural Science Foundation of China 62471313Shenzhen Medical Research Fund D2502005Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20240813141807010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of medical volumes in magnetic resonance imaging is essential for the exploration of organ structures. Despite the impressive performance of supervised learning in medical image segmentation, its reliance on the large availability of labeled datasets poses a challenge due to the expertise and effort required for data acquisition. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods extract additional information from unlabeled datasets without involvement of expert annotation, and many approaches have been proposed to assist with this task. However, they often yield satisfactory results in the central regions but do not perform well in the edge regions due to low contrast edges and ambiguous tissue intensities at the boundary. Meanwhile, standard loss functions are biased towards large regions and cause under-penalizing of boundary errors. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that effectively leverages unlabeled data to improve segmentation performance in cardiac structures. Firstly, we design a mutual learning module with multiple decoders to obtain different predicted probabilities through feature perturbations. Secondly, we apply a novel consistency constraint between labeled and unlabeled data by a dual fine-grained boundary loss that provide global characteristics-based guidance from the transition of the boundary region and an edge-aware uncertainty loss. We evaluate the proposed framework on two publicly available cardiac datasets, including the automated cardiac diagnosis challenge (ACDC) dataset under a 2D setting and the left atrium (LA) dataset under a 3D setting, and compare it with seven recent state-of-the-art semi-supervised methods. Through extensive qualitative visualization and quantitative experiments under standard semi-supervised settings, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach and its superior segmentation performance compared with existing methods. Furthermore, clinically relevant cardiac measurements derived from the segmentation results are evaluated to analyze the clinical relevance of the proposed framework. To support reproducibility and future research, our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/waqasanwaar/SSL4MIS_PMEUL .

Indexed as

Boundary lossImage segmentationSemi-supervised learningUncertainty estimation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.