Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479297›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Inverse-Intensity-Weighted Generalized Estimating Equations With Irregularly Measured Longitudinal Data and Informative Dropout.

George Stefan, Eleanor Pullenayegum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George StefanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5408-4786
Eleanor PullenayegumDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2021-02733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal data are commonly encountered in biomedical research, including randomized trials and retrospective cohort studies. Subjects are typically followed over a period of time and may be scheduled for follow-up at predetermined time points. However, subjects may miss their appointments or return at non-specified times, leading to irregularity in the visit process. IIW-GEEs have been developed as one method to account for this irregularity, whereby estimates from a visit intensity model are used as weights in a GEE model with an independent correlation structure. We show that currently available methods can be biased for situations in which the health outcome of interest may influence a subject's dropout from the study. We have extended the IIW-GEE framework to adjust for informative dropout and have demonstrated via simulation studies that this bias can be significantly reduced. We have illustrated this method using the STAR*D clinical trial data, and observed that the disease trajectory was generally overestimated when informative dropout was not accounted for.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPatient DropoutsBiasComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLongitudinal StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGEEinformative dropoutinverse‐intensity weightingirregular observationlongitudinal data

Identifiers

PMID42479297
PMCPMC13387368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.