ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Prevalence of opioid-induced constipation in the emergency department: a retrospective study.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comments on the "Prevalence of opioid‑induced constipation in the emergency department".Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Opioid-induced constipation as an emergency: the other side of pain relief.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opioids are widely prescribed for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. Gastro-intestinal side effects are common with opioid use, of which opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most prevalent. OIC can be difficult to manage, and may lead to increased healthcare utilization, including emergency department (ED) visits. However, data on the prevalence of OIC in the ED are limited. We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 2017 adult long-acting opioid users presenting to the ED between 2016 and 2022. OIC was diagnosed in 129 patients (6.4%; 95% CI 5.4-7.6%). Treatment included dose escalation of existing laxatives (37%), initiation of additional laxatives (25%), administration of enemas (47%) and use of peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (16%). A modest dose- and treatment time-response effect was observed, with higher opioid doses and longer treatment durations slightly increasing the risk of OIC at ED presentation. Cancer patients had significantly higher odds of having OIC at their ED visits compared to non-cancer patients (OR 8.81; 95% CI 5.89-13.17; p < 0.001), while sex was not associated with OIC (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.56-1.28). Oxycodone use was linked to higher odds of OIC (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.30-2.91), whereas tramadol use was associated with a significantly lower risk of OIC. 23 patients revisited the ED within 30 days due to OIC, and there were three deaths related to OIC. These findings highlight the clinically relevant burden of OIC in the ED, particularly among cancer patients and oxycodone users. Clinical awareness of OIC is needed, especially in patients with increased risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42479278What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.