Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479237›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs. nitrous oxide for procedural sedation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (INDEXJIA): a randomized crossover clinical trial.

Miikka Tervonen, Outi Peltoniemi, Paula Vähäsalo, Paula Keskitalo, Sirja Sard, Tytti Pokka, Merja Kallio

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03069638 (Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Sedation During Intra-articular Joint Injections in Pediatric Population), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03069638 phase4completednot on this map

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Sedation During Intra-articular Joint Injections in Pediatric Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OuluRan2017 to 2023Enrolled68ConditionsJuvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Joint InflammationArmsDexmedetomidine, Sedatives/Hypnotics,Other
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miikka TervonenDepartment of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 23, 90220, Oulu, Finland. miikka.tervonen@oulu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8109-8684
Outi PeltoniemiDepartment of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 23, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Paula VähäsaloDepartment of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 23, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Paula KeskitaloDepartment of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 23, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Sirja SardDepartment of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 23, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Tytti PokkaDepartment of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 23, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Merja KallioDepartment of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 23, 90220, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to compare intranasal dexmedetomidine with inhaled nitrous oxide for procedural pain relief and sedation during intra-articular injections in a pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinic. Patients from 1 to 18 years-of-age requiring 1-5 intra-articular injections were randomized to receive 2 µg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine or inhaled nitrous oxide in the first visit. When the patient required subsequent treatment visit, the other sedative was administered. The primary outcome was patient-reported pain immediately after recovery from sedation. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, level of sedation and patient's pain assessed by the parent, rheumatologist, and nurse were secondary outcomes. Out of 119 eligible patients, 68 were included, and 43 received both medications at two separate visits. Overall pain experience was mild and did not differ between dexmedetomidine and nitrous oxide in patient-reported pain immediately after the procedure (difference, 0.2; 95% CI - 0.7 to 1.2, p = 0.65) but the patients recalled milder pain after nitrous oxide in the follow-up survey (difference, - 1.3; 95% CI - 2.3 to - 0.3; p = 0.01). Milder pain was reported during the second visit compared to the first visit regardless of the sedative used (difference, - 1.2; 95% CI - 2.1 to - 0.2; p = 0.02). In the follow-up survey, majority (69%) of patients would prefer nitrous oxide to dexmedetomidine for sedation in future.

conclusionsBoth intranasal dexmedetomidine and inhaled nitrous oxide offered effective analgosedation for intra-articular injections in children. Nitrous oxide resulted in better patient experience and became their preference for future sedation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov TRN: NCT03069638. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03069638 . The date of registration 2016-12-20. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Children suffering juvenile idiopathic arthritis often require repeated intra-articular injections. • Procedural sedation is being used during these procedures. WHAT IS NEW: • When intranasal dexmedetomidine and nitrous oxide was compared in a crossover design both agents provided effective analgosedation without difference in patient-reported pain immediately after the procedure. • Despite this, most patients favored nitrous oxide for future sedation.

Indexed as

Arthritis, JuvenileDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesNitrous OxideProcedural SedationAdministration, IntranasalAdolescentAnesthetics, InhalationChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleAnesthetics, InhalationDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesNitrous OxideChildIntra-articular injectionPainProcedural sedationRheumatic disease

Identifiers

PMID42479237
PMCPMC13388443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.