Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479230›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2026

Alternative Payment Models and Diabetes Outcomes.

Marshall H Chin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marshall H ChinSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2007, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. mchin@bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1924-5641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDetermine whether and how alternative payment models (APMs) impact diabetes care and outcomes. Explain what APMs are and highlight key principles of effective APMs. Provide a conceptual model for how APMs can support transformation to evidence-based population health delivery models that improve diabetes outcomes. RECENT

findingsAdvanced APMs with shared savings or global budgets, along with quality incentives, tended to improve diabetes and composite chronic condition outcomes, and can reduce Medicare Part A hospital and Part B outpatient costs. Advanced APMs, particularly models with global budgets that hold health care organizations accountable for total cost of care and quality of care, can improve diabetes outcomes and reduce costs. Careful design and implementation of APMs are essential to provide the appropriate mix of incentives, support, and risk for participants to succeed in APMs and develop effective population health management models.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHealth Care CostsHumansQuality of Health CareUnited StatesValue-Based Health CareAlternative payment modelsDiabetesPaymentQuality of careValue-based payment

Identifiers

PMID42479230
PMCPMC13388329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.