Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479180›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2026

Distinct Cortical Microstructure in Postmenopausal Women with Distal Radius and Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Mikolaj Bartosik, Alexander Simon, Oskar Windels, Felix N von Brackel, Florian Barvencik, Michael Amling, Ralf Oheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mikolaj BartosikDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9094-6021
Alexander SimonDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-8983
Oskar WindelsDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7522-4887
Felix N von BrackelDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6586-6794
Florian BarvencikDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0200-8431
Michael AmlingDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2382-8348
Ralf OheimDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany. r.oheim@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9449-5013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distal radius fractures and proximal humerus fractures are common fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The question of whether bone microstructural deficits are reflected in specific changes in bone microstructure at peripheral skeletal sites has not yet been investigated. In this retrospective study, treatment-naïve postmenopausal women with distal radius fractures (DRF) or proximal humerus fractures (PHF) were included. Of more than 500 patients screened, 30 patients with DRF and 30 patients with PHF were included in the final analysis following propensity score matching. All participants underwent biochemical testing, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment, and bone microstructural evaluation by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. After propensity score matching, both groups showed no significant differences in terms of age, weight, height, BMI, and lowest T-score (all p > 0.05). Mean age was 64.4 ± 10.7 years in the DRF group and 66.7 ± 9.0 years in the PHF group (p = 0.365). In both groups, the lowest mean T-score was - 2.9 (p = 0.539). Overall, both groups showed a reduction in total BMD and microarchitectural parameters compared to reference values at the distal radius and tibia. The PHF group exhibited significantly reduced bone geometry at the distal radius compared with the DRF group, including lower total area (p = 0.004), trabecular area (p = 0.021), and cortical area (p = 0.006), as well as reduced cortical thickness at both the distal radius (p = 0.031) and tibia (p = 0.024). PHF are characterized by reduced cortical thickness and unfavorable bone geometry, which is independent of areal bone mineral density.

Indexed as

Osteoporosis, PostmenopausalRadius FracturesShoulder FracturesWrist FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedBone DensityFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostmenopauseRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedFragility fracturesHigh resolution peripheral quantitative computer tomographyHumerus fracturePostmenopausal osteoporosisRadius fracture

Identifiers

PMID42479180
PMCPMC13388505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.