ArticleCalcified tissue international2026
Distinct Cortical Microstructure in Postmenopausal Women with Distal Radius and Proximal Humerus Fractures.
Article in Calcified tissue international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal radius fractures and proximal humerus fractures are common fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The question of whether bone microstructural deficits are reflected in specific changes in bone microstructure at peripheral skeletal sites has not yet been investigated. In this retrospective study, treatment-naïve postmenopausal women with distal radius fractures (DRF) or proximal humerus fractures (PHF) were included. Of more than 500 patients screened, 30 patients with DRF and 30 patients with PHF were included in the final analysis following propensity score matching. All participants underwent biochemical testing, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment, and bone microstructural evaluation by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. After propensity score matching, both groups showed no significant differences in terms of age, weight, height, BMI, and lowest T-score (all p > 0.05). Mean age was 64.4 ± 10.7 years in the DRF group and 66.7 ± 9.0 years in the PHF group (p = 0.365). In both groups, the lowest mean T-score was - 2.9 (p = 0.539). Overall, both groups showed a reduction in total BMD and microarchitectural parameters compared to reference values at the distal radius and tibia. The PHF group exhibited significantly reduced bone geometry at the distal radius compared with the DRF group, including lower total area (p = 0.004), trabecular area (p = 0.021), and cortical area (p = 0.006), as well as reduced cortical thickness at both the distal radius (p = 0.031) and tibia (p = 0.024). PHF are characterized by reduced cortical thickness and unfavorable bone geometry, which is independent of areal bone mineral density.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.