ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Prognostic value of liver stiffness measurement and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in chronic liver disease: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic liver disease (CLD) has a heterogeneous clinical course, and noninvasive identification of patients at increased risk of liver-related adverse outcomes remains clinically important. Although liver stiffness measurement (LSM) is widely used to assess fibrosis and disease severity, the prognostic value of CEUS findings in CLD remains less well defined. This study evaluated the prognostic value of LSM and CEUS findings, individually and in combination, in patients with CLD.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted involving 258 CLD patients from a tertiary hospital between June 2020 and June 2022. All patients underwent conventional ultrasound, liver elastography (LE), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations, with 3-year follow-up to observe adverse events including hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence. Collinearity assessment and events per variable principle were applied to ensure model stability. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, Cox regression for prognostic factor analysis, ROC curves for predictive efficacy evaluation, and subgroup analyses for consistency assessment across different clinical strata.
resultsFollow-up was completed in 235 patients (91.08%). During follow-up, 46 liver-related adverse events (19.57%) occurred, including 35 cases of hepatic decompensation, 8 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma, and 3 cases of liver-related deaths. The adverse event group had significantly higher liver stiffness measurement (LSM) values compared to the non-event group (24.68 ± 8.12 kPa vs. 17.02 ± 6.35 kPa, P < 0.001), and higher CEUS abnormality rates (67.39% vs. 28.57%, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression with four variables (disease duration, Child-Pugh score, LSM value, and CEUS abnormality) showed that LSM values (HR = 1.098, 95%CI: 1.069-1.128, P < 0.001) and CEUS abnormalities (HR = 2.412, 95%CI: 1.326-4.389, P = 0.004) were independent prognostic factors. LSM values ≥ 18.72 kPa predicted adverse endpoint events with 69.57% sensitivity, 86.77% specificity, and AUC of 0.811 (95%CI: 0.734-0.887). CEUS abnormalities predicted adverse endpoint events with 67.39% sensitivity, 71.43% specificity, and AUC of 0.735 (95%CI: 0.654-0.816). Combined ultrasound parameters achieved 84.78% sensitivity, 74.60% specificity, and AUC of 0.846 (95%CI: 0.775-0.917), superior to individual indicators (P < 0.05). Risk stratification based on LSM values and CEUS classified patients into low-risk group (3-year event-free survival rate 93.89%), intermediate-risk group (78.79%), and high-risk group (36.84%), with statistically significant differences between groups (P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent prognostic value across different disease etiologies and liver function strata (all P for interaction > 0.05).
conclusionHigher LSM values and CEUS abnormalities were independently associated with liver-related adverse outcomes in patients with CLD. Combining LSM and CEUS may improve prognostic stratification; however, prospective external validation is required before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42479153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.