ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
Artificial intelligence-generated color overlay for ultrasound identification of the brachial plexus in regional anesthesia: an external validation study.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to the letter regarding "Artificial intelligence-generated color overlay for ultrasound identification of the brachial plexus in regional anesthesia: an external validation study".Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Comment on 'Artificial intelligence-generated color overlay for ultrasound identification of the brachial plexus in regional anesthesia: an external validation study by Kamimura et al.'Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate identification of neural structures is essential for safe ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Although artificial intelligence (AI)-generated color overlay has been introduced to support anatomical recognition, external validation using clinically oriented evaluation methods remains limited. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an AI-generated color overlay for visualizing neural structures corresponding to the C5 and C6 nerve roots.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, two anesthesiology trainees performed bilateral interscalene ultrasound scans in 20 healthy adult volunteers. During live scanning, ultrasound-system video recordings were saved from the initiation of scanning to acquisition of an optimal image, and still images were captured at the optimal image. Subsequently, with the operators blinded to the AI output, the color overlay generated in real time during ultrasound scanning was evaluated. Two board-certified anesthesiologists independently evaluated the datasets and assessed the accuracy of the color overlay in visualizing neural structures corresponding to the C5 and C6 nerve roots using a four-category classification: true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative.
resultsOf the 160 evaluated nerve structures, six structures without expert consensus were excluded from analysis. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 93.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.6-96.7), 88.9% (95% CI, 56.5-98.0), and 93.5% (95% CI, 88.5-96.4), respectively. Among all evaluated structures, false-positive and false-negative findings accounted for 0.7% and 5.8%, respectively.
conclusionAI-generated color overlay demonstrated high accuracy in visualizing neural structures corresponding to the C5 and C6 nerve roots at the interscalene level on ultrasound images. This technology may enhance anatomical recognition and serve as a useful diagnostic and educational support tool, while complementing, rather than replacing, clinicians' own interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42479132What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.