Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42479089›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Designing Efficient Multicenter Trials With a Maximin Strategy.

Math J J M Candel, Gerard J P van Breukelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Math J J M CandelDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2229-1131
Gerard J P van BreukelenDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), and Graduate School of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0949-0272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For two-treatment multicenter trials with a continuous outcome, designs are presented that minimize the number of subjects required or the research budget, when aiming for a desired power level. These designs optimize both the allocation ratio of participants between treatment and control condition within each center, and the balance between the number of centers and the number of participants per center. Because optimal designs rely on prior knowledge of variance parameters from the analysis model, which are unknown during the design stage, maximin designs are introduced. These designs guarantee a pre-specified power level across plausible ranges of the unknown parameters and maximize power under worst-case parameter values. The present study extends the existing literature on multicenter designs by deriving maximin designs not only for the case where the number of centers and the sample size per center can be optimized, but also when either the number of centers or the sample size per center is fixed due to practical constraints. An empirical example illustrates sample size calculation for such designs and potential budget savings. Additionally, an interactive R Shiny app has been developed to simplify sample size calculations for maximin multicenter trials.

Indexed as

Multicenter Studies as TopicResearch DesignHumansModels, StatisticalSample Sizeefficient designmaximin designmulticenter trialpowersample size calculation

Identifiers

PMID42479089
PMCPMC13387372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.