ArticleJournal of vision2026
Effects of "temporal preparation" on neural processing of physical and affective material attributes.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It remains unclear whether different material attributes, such as glossiness and aesthetics, rely on different stages of visual processing. This study investigated how "temporal preparation," defined here as participants' expectation of stimulus duration, modulates the neural dynamics of material perception, thereby helping reveal the underlying processing stages. Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded while participants viewed images of various objects and made judgments of either glossiness or aesthetic value. Temporal preparation was manipulated by changing the ratio of short (100 ms) to long (1000 ms) stimulus presentations within each session. This manipulation was intended to alter participants' expectations of stimulus duration without directly constraining the actual presentation duration. Decoding analyses were used to classify binary perceptual judgments from the EEG signals. The results showed that expectations of shorter durations enhanced decoding accuracy for glossiness, whereas expectations of longer stimulus durations tended to enhance decoding accuracy for aesthetics. These findings suggest that temporal preparation influences neural representations differently depending on the material attribute. This approach provides a useful methodological framework for dissociating perceptual strategies and offers new insights into the temporal dynamics of different material impressions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.