ArticleJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
Three Drugs, Two Pills, One Algorithm: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study of Consolidated Guidelines for HIV PrEP, PEP, and Treatment Initiation for Resource-Limited and Non-specialty Settings in the United States.
Article in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundAccessing HIV prevention and treatment remains difficult throughout the United States (US). With the shortage of infectious disease physicians, increasing the number of clinicians offering HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP), and Test & Treat (T&T) is imperative. This exploratory project created a consolidated algorithm for HIV treatment and prevention that simplifies care for US providers with limited resources or experiences.MethodsThe algorithm was designed for PrEP, PEP, and treatment initiation using published guidelines from multiple clinical bodies. Three medications were included in the algorithm: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir. US medical students completed an eight-question pretest unassisted then repeated questions with the algorithm to test the algorithm's functionality. Questions included clinical scenarios on HIV testing, PrEP, PEP, and T&T. Pearson's chi-squared compared pre vs post-test scores; total scores (number of items correct) were analyzed using Paired Wilcoxon signed rank test.Results97 students from 13 medical schools completed pre and post-test questions. Correctness increased from 3 of 8 (pretest) to 7 of 8 (post-test) (p< 0.001). All questions saw statistically significant improvement in correctness when assisted by the algorithm including correctly prescribing PEP, selecting appropriate labs for PrEP initiation, and screening patients with prior cabotegravir-based PrEP using HIV RNA quantitative (p<0.001 for all).ConclusionsThis algorithm improved medical students' abilities to accurately answer HIV clinical care questions about HIV prevention and treatment. Further studies are needed to understand the algorithm's effect in clinical settings and how to implement it in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.