ReviewCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2026
Percutaneous Transaxillary Access for Large-Bore Cardiovascular Interventions: Evidence, Technique, and Complication Management.
Review in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Percutaneous Transaxillary Access for Large-Bore Cardiovascular Interventions: Evidence, Technique, and Complication Management.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous transaxillary access is an established alternative to transfemoral large-bore arterial access for transcatheter structural heart interventions and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Although useful for overcoming hostile iliofemoral anatomy and providing prolonged support and patient mobilization in case of MCS, the axillary/subclavian territory poses distinct technical and anatomical challenges that demand meticulous pre-procedural imaging, patient selection, accurate puncture under ultrasound and angiographic guidance, preservation of bailout access, and familiarity with suture-based and balloon-assisted closure strategies. This review provides a contemporary practical framework for percutaneous transaxillary access, summarizing the available clinical evidence, technical aspects of puncture and closure, complication management, and procedural tips to improve safety and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.