Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42478890›Full record

ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2026

Preclinical Serial Assessment of Virtual Physiology After Implantation of a Novel Endoluminal Resorbable Fibrillated Scaffold.

Kotaro Miyashita, Lucas Hatzikostas, Emiliano Bianchini, Milosz Dziarmaga, Chun-Ting Shih, Jouke Dijkstra, Eric K W Poon, Bart Sanders, Golo von Basum, Rick de Vries and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Preclinical Serial Assessment of Virtual Physiology After Implantation of a Novel Endoluminal Resorbable Fibrillated Scaffold.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kotaro MiyashitaCORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Lab, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Lucas HatzikostasDepartment of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Emiliano BianchiniCORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Lab, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Milosz DziarmagaDepartment of Cardiology, Intensive Therapy and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Chun-Ting ShihCORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Lab, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Jouke DijkstraDepartment of Radiology, Division of Image Processing, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Eric K W PoonDepartment of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Bart SandersStentit B.V., Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Golo von BasumStentit B.V., Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Rick de VriesStentit B.V., Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Kim van NoortStentit B.V., Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Marc van SambeekDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Jos C van den BergClinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland.
Albert ChinhenzvaCORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Lab, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Scot GargDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK.
Yoshinobu OnumaCORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Lab, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Patrick W SerruysCORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Lab, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9636-1104

Funding

STENTiT B.VSTENTiT B.V.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe resorbable fibrillated scaffold (RFS) is a novel electrospun, polylactide-based endoluminal scaffold developed for peripheral arterial applications. Its porous microfibre architecture is intended to support host cell infiltration and vascular restoration. Although its near-wall hemodynamic behaviour has been characterised, its serial anatomical and virtual physiological evolution after implantation has not previously been examined.

aimsTo characterise the serial anatomical changes of the RFS after implantation in peripheral arterial models, and to assess the hemodynamic significance of luminal narrowing during follow-up using image-derived virtual flow indices.

methodsTwo preclinical studies were conducted in rabbit and mini-pig peripheral arterial models. The RFS was implanted bilaterally in the external iliac arteries of three rabbits and in the profunda femoris arteries of six mini-pigs. Serial follow-up to 3 months was performed using invasive angiography and intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) for anatomical assessment. Virtual physiology was assessed using angiography-derived Murray-law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) and OCT-derived flow ratio (OFR).

resultsImplantation was technically successful in all but one case. In rabbits, between post-implantation and 3 months, reference vessel diameter increased from 2.08 to 2.54 mm (p = 0.03), while minimum lumen diameter remained stable; OCT-derived area stenosis increased from 28.9% to 56.1% (p < 0.01), scaffold length shortened from 10.40 to 8.63 mm (p < 0.01), and μFR decreased from 0.99 to 0.92 (p = 0.04), whereas OFR remained unchanged. In mini-pigs, the principal changes occurred between post-implantation and 1 month, with reductions in minimum lumen diameter, minimum lumen area, μFR, and OFR (all p ≤ 0.03), accompanied by increased stenosis and relative stabilization thereafter. Both μFR and OFR declined non-linearly with increasing OCT-derived %AS, with similar model fit (R

conclusionThis preclinical study supports the feasibility of RFS implantation in peripheral arteries and demonstrates that the device undergoes early structural evolution after deployment. Virtual physiological assessment showed that these anatomical changes were accompanied by measurable reductions in flow indices, though most values remained above the 0.80 reference threshold. Together, these findings provide a basis for further development of the technology and for future studies incorporating both anatomical and virtual physiological assessment.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresFemoral ArteryHemodynamicsIliac ArteryAnimalsBlood Flow VelocityModels, AnimalPolyestersProsthesis DesignRabbitsRegional Blood FlowSwine, MiniatureTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherencePolyesterspoly(lactide)bioresorbable scaffoldoptical coherence tomographyperipheral artery diseasequantitative flow ratioresorbable fibrillated scaffoldvirtual physiology

Identifiers

PMID42478890
PMCPMC13667315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.