Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42478880›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Cryptic Vocal Communication in the Proboscis Bat (Rhynchonycteris naso).

Lena E Dressler, Karl-Heinz Frommolt, Mirjam Knörnschild, Martina Nagy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cryptic Vocal Communication in the Proboscis Bat (Rhynchonycteris naso).Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lena E DresslerMuseum Für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute For Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4579-1152
Karl-Heinz FrommoltMuseum Für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute For Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-7358
Mirjam KnörnschildMuseum Für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute For Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0448-9600
Martina NagyMuseum Für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute For Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-3930

Funding

Elsa-Neumann FoundationH2020 European Research CouncilLeibniz Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptic-living animals face the trade-off between communicating effectively while avoiding detection. To examine how this trade-off shapes vocal behavior, we studied the vocal repertoire of the cryptic-living, neotropical proboscis bat (Rhynchonycteris naso; Emballonuridae). R. naso produces 22 syllable types and 17 vocalization types, including song. One common social vocalization type resembles modified echolocation calls and may also provide sensory information. Vocalizations shaped by natural selection appeared adapted to minimize predation risk: they are short, span broad frequency ranges, have limited detection ranges, and are mostly emitted during rocking, a behavior that maintains crypsis. In contrast, sexually selected vocalizations such as song are more conspicuous, highlighting a tension between effective signaling and remaining undetected. A phylogenetic analysis across 38 emballonurid bat species revealed that R. naso emits exceptionally high-frequency echolocation calls, beyond expectation from body size alone, and beyond the hearing range of most predators and prey, probably reflecting acoustic crypsis. The high-frequency echolocation calls of R. naso reduce detection distances for hearing moths and likely increase capture success. Overall, our study shows that R. naso employs diverse acoustic adaptations to communicate effectively while minimizing detection risk, offering rare insight into the evolution of vocal behaviors in cryptic species.

Indexed as

ChiropteraVocalization, AnimalAnimalsEcholocationFemalePhylogenyacoustic crypsisbatsChiropteraselection pressuresignaturesocial vocalizationvocal communication

Identifiers

PMID42478880
PMCPMC13387082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.