Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42478860›Full record

ArticlemSystems2026

Psychrophiles elude genomic prediction of optimal growth temperature.

Alexandra Walling, Michael Hoffert, Noah Fierer, J L Weissman

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra WallingInstitute for Advanced Computational Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Michael HoffertCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Noah FiererCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
J L WeissmanInstitute for Advanced Computational Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4237-4807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While there have been numerous efforts to use genomic information to predict the optimal growth temperatures of bacteria and archaea, such models are often highly inaccurate when applied to taxa with lower optimal growth temperatures, including "cold-loving" psychrophiles. Toki et al. explain why this might be the case, namely, that adaptations to low-temperature growth evolved more recently and are thus less phylogenetically conserved than adaptations to growth at higher temperatures. Leveraging this information about evolutionary history, S. Toki, M. Matsui, K. Tominaga, T. K. Suzuki, et al. (mSystems 11:e00062-26, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00062-26) offer a solution that uses gene presence/absence information instead of models based solely on amino acid composition to predict the optimal growth temperatures of psychrophiles.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaGenomicsAdaptation, PhysiologicalCold TemperatureGenome, BacterialTemperaturemicrobial growthoptimal growth temperaturetemperaturetraits

Identifiers

PMID42478860
PMCPMC13483452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.