ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2026
Virology laboratory biohazards: infectious MS2 aerosols emitted from common procedures and accidental laboratory scenarios in a controlled chamber study.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infectious viral aerosols outside primary containment represent a profound yet undercharacterized occupational biohazard in microbiological environments. While the role of viral aerosols in laboratory-acquired infections is widely acknowledged, quantitative data on the concentration and size distribution of viral aerosols generated during common laboratory workflows remain limited. This study addresses these gaps by using a controlled chamber to characterize the generation of aerosols containing either a physical tracer, sodium fluorescein, or a viral pathogen surrogate, bacteriophage MS2. By integrating aerodynamic particle sizing with cascade impaction and filtered collection, we quantified the mass, number, and infectivity of aerosols emitted during both routine laboratory procedures and simulated accidental releases. These results reveal that every evaluated action generated measurable aerosols spanning multiple particle sizes. Importantly, all MS2-based actions produced infectious aerosols within the respirable size fraction, confirming that routine benchtop pipetting actions yield viral aerosols. These data provide an empirical foundation for evidence-based risk assessments. IMPORTANCE: Laboratory-acquired viral infections have occurred following routine laboratory procedures in which no distinct accident is recorded, suggesting unrecognized release and inhalation of infectious virus. This research provides a quantitative analysis of these aerosols using a non-pathogenic viral surrogate, MS2, to model viral pathogens. We demonstrate that common laboratory tasks, such as pipetting or handling culture plates, generate respirable infectious aerosols that can bypass standard precautions when outside primary containment. By defining the size and infectious load of these aerosols, this work enables biosafety professionals to transition from qualitative assumptions to data-driven safety protocols, ultimately protecting the personnel responsible for viral pathogen research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.