ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Professional Autonomy in Nursing Practice: A Qualitative Study From the Perspective of Nurse Managers.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Professional Autonomy in Nursing Practice: A Qualitative Study From the Perspective of Nurse Managers.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to examine nurse managers' perceptions of nurses' professional autonomy, how professional autonomy is enacted and supported in clinical care settings, and the managerial and organizational processes influencing autonomous nursing practice.
designA qualitative descriptive study.
backgroundProfessional autonomy is a core component of nursing practice and is associated with care quality. While previous studies have predominantly examined autonomy from nurses' perspectives, evidence remains limited regarding nurse managers' views and their role in shaping organizational conditions that enable or constrain autonomous nursing practice.
methodsThis study was conducted in a 300-bed public hospital in Türkiye. Fifteen nurse managers working in acute care units participated in semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis and reported in accordance with the COREQ guidelines.
resultsThree main categories emerged: (1) integration of nurses' professional autonomy into the clinical care process; (2) nurse managers' strategies for strengthening professional autonomy; and (3) balancing nurses' professional autonomy with physician-centered care in clinical practice. Nurse managers described professional autonomy as most visible in routine and individualized nursing care, particularly in complex clinical situations. Educational support, mentoring, participatory leadership, fair workload distribution, feedback, and a supportive organizational climate were identified as key facilitators. In contrast, physician-centered organizational structures, hierarchical norms, heavy workloads, and limited resources were perceived as major constraints on nurses' autonomous decision-making.
conclusionAccording to nurse managers, professional autonomy emerged as a dynamic process shaped by managerial practices, organizational conditions, and interprofessional relationships rather than solely an individual competence. Nurse managers play a critical role in fostering work environments that support nurses' autonomous clinical judgment while maintaining safe and collaborative care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers should strengthen professional autonomy through structured orientation, competency-based mentoring, participatory decision-making, and equitable workload distribution. Creating psychologically safe environments that support open communication may enhance nurses' autonomous judgment and improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.