Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42478716›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2026

African network for statistical excellence in health research.

Michal Ordak, Lise Korsten, George Oyamo Osanjo, Adey Desta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michal OrdakCentre of Regenerative Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland.
Lise KorstenDepartment of Science, Technology and Innovation, Pretoria, South Africa.
George Oyamo OsanjoDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
Adey DestaDepartment of Microbial Sciences and Genetics, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increasing research output across Africa, weaknesses in statistical methodology continue to compromise the quality, reproducibility, and practical value of health research. Although substantial investments have been made in research capacity strengthening, limitations in statistical training and access to biostatistical expertise remain widespread. Existing initiatives, including regional postgraduate programmes and institution-specific training schemes, have contributed to advances in biostatistical capacity but remain fragmented, geographically limited, and insufficiently integrated into routine research practice. In this viewpoint, we argue that strengthening statistical capacity in Africa now requires a coordinated, continent-wide training network embedded within existing academic and research systems, rather than continued reliance on isolated programmes. The proposed model emphasises scalable training infrastructure, integration of statistical expertise throughout the research process, and structured collaboration between institutions facing similar methodological challenges. Central components include accessible training resources, mentorship, incorporation of statistics into existing curricula, and practical support linked to ongoing research activities. Emphasis is placed on standardising core competencies in statistical practice, including appropriate method selection, assessment of assumptions, transparent reporting, and accurate interpretation of findings. By embedding statistical thinking from study design through publication, the proposed network aims to improve methodological consistency, strengthen research credibility, and enhance the global impact and usability of health research conducted across Africa.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchBiostatisticsCapacity BuildingAfricaHumansAfricabiostatistics capacity buildingstatistical training networks

Identifiers

PMID42478716
PMCPMC13386609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.