ArticleBlood advances2026
A prospective study of familial predisposition to plasma cell dyscrasias.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPlasma cell dyscrasias (PCDs) exhibit familial aggregation, yet data quantifying this risk through active screening remain limited. Herein, we designed this study to identify and quantify the familial risk of PCDs by detailed family trees and screening all first- and second-degree relatives of affected patients. We approached 1084 consecutive patients with PCDs at a single center between 2017 and 2019, of whom 864 eligible index patients provided consent to first- and second-degree relative screening. Detailed pedigrees were created for all patients, and screening with serum protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and free light chain assays was performed. Spouses were also screened as a control group. In total, 2481 family members were screened; median age was 63 years. At least 1 additional family member with a monoclonal gammopathy (MG) was detected in 98 (11.3%) of the 864 screened families. A positive history of PCD or other B-cell malignancy was present in 2.1% of the families. Notably, the screening process identified 41 new cases of MGs (4.7% yield per family). The incidence was 4.5% among siblings and second-degree relatives compared to 2.6% in the control group. In conclusion, this large prospective study confirms a familial predisposition to PCDs, revealing that >11% of the affected families have multiple members with MGs, corresponding to at least twice the risk of PCDs among members of affected families. These findings support the potential clinical value of active screening for relatives of patients with PCDs to facilitate early diagnosis, appropriate monitoring, and prompt intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.