ArticleBlood advances2026
Efficacy and safety of BCMA-targeted therapies in relapsed or refractory AL amyloidosis: a descriptive pooled analysis.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractB-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapies have emerged as promising treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. However, comprehensive data on their efficacy and safety remain limited. We conducted a systematic descriptive pooled analysis of published studies reporting outcomes of BCMA-directed therapies including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The analysis included 256 patients. CAR-T therapy was administered to 89 patients (35%), BsAbs to 82 patients (32%), and ADCs to 85 patients (33%). The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 83%, with CAR-T demonstrating 92% ORR; BsAbs, 89%; and ADCs, 68%. Deep hematologic responses (≥very good partial response) were achieved in ∼70% of CAR-T and BsAb recipients and 64% of ADC recipients. Minimal residual disease negativity was documented in 75% of evaluable CAR-T patients and in 86% of evaluable BsAb patients with reported data. Organ responses were observed in 30% of evaluable patients, with cardiac responses in 41%. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 74% of CAR-T and 49% of BsAb patients, predominantly grade 1 to 2. Grade ≥3 CRS was rare (9% in CAR-T and 1% in BsAb). Ocular toxicity was the predominant adverse event in ADC recipients (84% with any grade and 29% with grade ≥3). Grade ≥3 infections occurred in 13% of CAR-T, 20% of BsAb, and 6% of ADC patients. BCMA-targeted therapies result in high response rates with manageable safety profiles among patients with heavily pretreated AL amyloidosis, supporting continued investigation and clinical application of these approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.