ArticleChronic respiratory disease
Shared decision-making about prolonged invasive ventilation for adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1.
Article in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The option of tracheostomy and prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for chronic respiratory failure in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) poses challenges in decision-making. The Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation consensus recommendations on respiratory management do not directly address the implications of this intervention given the progressive physical and cognitive manifestations of DM1. Here, we consider IMV in DM1 using the ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice. We call for further research on post-tracheostomy morbidity, mortality, and quality of life (QOL) to help guide decision-making. Our ethical analysis has yielded programmatic changes we hope will improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.