Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42478542›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: A Comparison of Spectral Peak-Picking and Interleaved Stimulation Strategies.

Paul G Mayo, Andrew D Brown, Matthew G Goupell

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul G MayoDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5751-5038
Andrew D BrownDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0838-2894
Matthew G GoupellDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2662-3057

Funding

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
Optimizing bilateral and single-sided-deafness cochlear implants for functioning in complex auditory environmentsR01DC020506 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Joshua Gary Bernstein, Matthew J. Goupell · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020506NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) effectively restore speech understanding in quiet for many recipients. However, bilateral CI listeners continue to perform poorer than acoustic-hearing listeners on spatial-hearing tasks such as sound localization. One explanation is that stimulation strategies and the lack of coordination across sound processors degrade the fidelity of binaural cues. To provide further insight on this issue, this study compared the binaural cues transmitted by two CI stimulation strategies: a spectral peak-picking stimulation strategy and a constantly stimulating strategy. Two clinical CI sound processors were placed on a binaural manikin centered in a horizontal ring of loudspeakers in an anechoic chamber. Speech and non-speech stimuli were presented from the loudspeakers and the resulting electrical pulse trains were recorded. Envelope interaural time differences and interaural level differences were extracted from the recordings. Binaural cues were compared between the two stimulation strategies and against acoustic cues measured using behind-the-ear microphones. Results showed that, compared to the constantly stimulating strategy, the spectral peak-picking strategy led to more variable and less monotonic binaural cues, which could constrain sound-localization abilities. These findings highlight the need for bilateral coordination of CIs in multiple domains, including electrode selection in peak-picking stimulation strategies and pulse timing. (198/250).

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCuesPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSound LocalizationSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationElectric StimulationHumansProsthesis DesignTime Factorsbinaural cuescochlear implantsound codingsound localizationspatial hearing

Identifiers

PMID42478542
PMCPMC13389220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.