ArticleBJPsych open2026
Bringing treatment home for adolescents with eating disorders.
Article in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing demand for adolescent eating disorder services during and following the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated alternative treatment approaches. Traditional in-patient and daycare settings faced challenges, including resource limitations and geographical accessibility.
aimsTo describe and evaluate the outcomes of the Hospital at Home (H@H) service, an innovative, virtual, intensive treatment programme designed to prevent in-patient admissions or shorten length of in-patient stay.
methodA prospective cohort of 71 consecutive admissions from October 2021 to December 2024 was established. Data included percentage median body mass index (%mBMI), Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and any readmissions for in-patient treatment within the following 6 months. Qualitative feedback was also sought from staff and a sample of patients and family members.
resultsOf the 71 admissions to H@H, only 9 (13%) required hospitalisation. Mean %mBMI increased significantly, from 82.4% (s.d. 8.17) on admission to 90.07% (s.d. 9.44) on discharge (
conclusionsThis innovative model prevented hospital admissions, demonstrating clinical benefits and high user satisfaction. Expansion and further research are recommended to explore the long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.