ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Patient Portal Use and Cancer Screening in the United States: Individual Associations and Population Impact.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesCancer screening uptake in the United States remains below national targets despite established screening recommendations. Patient portals may support preventive care delivery, but their association with cancer screening uptake and population-level contribution remains unclear. We evaluated the association between patient portal use and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among screening-eligible U.S. adults.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using pooled data from the nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey. Screening-eligible adults were defined according to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The primary exposure was self-reported patient portal use within the prior 12 months. Outcomes included receipt of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Survey-weighted modified Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Adjusted absolute differences were estimated using marginal standardization, and population attributable risk percent (PARP) was calculated to estimate the population-level contribution of portal use.ResultsAmong 23,920 respondents, 13,210 (55.2%) reported patient portal use. Portal users had higher screening uptake than non-users for breast cancer screening (85.7% vs 75.1%; p<0.001), cervical cancer screening (83.8% vs 73.7%; p<0.001), and colorectal cancer screening (84.0% vs 72.5%; p=0.002). After adjustment, portal use was associated with higher prevalence of breast cancer screening (aPR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.27; p=0.004) and cervical cancer screening (aPR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.20; p=0.002), with a more modest association for colorectal cancer screening (aPR 1.08, 95% CI 0.99-1.17; p=0.07). Adjusted absolute differences associated with portal use were +14.3%, +12.9%, and +9.0% for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening, respectively. PARP estimates were 7.7%, 6.9%, and 3.6%, respectively.ConclusionPatient portal use was associated with higher uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening, with a more modest and not statistically significant association for colorectal cancer screening after adjustment. Although portal engagement may support preventive care delivery, its population-level contribution to screening uptake was modest, suggesting that portal-based strategies should be paired with broader interventions addressing access, digital literacy, and structural barriers to cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.