Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42478332›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical psychology2026

Optimizing Expectations Leads to Enhanced Efficacy of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention in Individuals With Low-Baseline Expectations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Stefan Salzmann, Frank Euteneuer, Christiane A Melzig, Winfried Rief, Christoph Benke

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefan SalzmannClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.
Frank EuteneuerFaculty of Human Sciences, Division of Biological Psychology and Neuroscience, Vinzenz Pallotti University, Vallendar, Germany.
Christiane A MelzigClinical Psychology, Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.
Winfried RiefClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.
Christoph BenkeClinical Psychology, Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)-Project-ID 422744262 422744262-TRR289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment expectations for medical and psychological treatments and positive patient-provider interactions are critical mechanisms driving the placebo effect and may augment an intervention's effects. However, it remains unclear whether optimizing treatment expectations is beneficial for all individuals. This pilot randomized controlled trial (three-arm parallel design) examined whether i) optimizing treatment expectations would augment the efficacy of a mindfulness intervention and ii) whether participants' treatment expectations at baseline would moderate these effects.

methodsSixty-six healthy participants were randomized (1:1:1) to one of 3 experimental groups: i) body scan and an instruction aiming to optimize treatment expectations (EXPECT), ii) body scan and a neutral instruction (NEUTRAL), or iii) listening to an audiobook and neutral instruction (CONTROL). Primary outcomes were changes in positive and negative affect; secondary outcomes included treatment expectations, perceived stress, and mindfulness. Baseline expectations were assessed as a moderator using ANCOVA.

resultsANCOVA indicated a group effect on positive affect (p = 0.018, d = 0.65), with individuals in the EXPECT group showing a stronger reduction than both other groups. Post-hoc comparisons showed significant differences between EXPECT and NEUTRAL (p = 0.015, d = -0.77) and between EXPECT and CONTROL (p = 0.012, d = -0.80). Analyzes did not indicate main effects on other outcomes. Participants with low baseline expectations showed a stronger increase in reported treatment expectations and mindfulness, as well as a more pronounced decrease in perceived stress from baseline- to post-assessment in the EXPECT group compared to both other groups. In contrast, individuals with high baseline expectations indicated less stress reduction when undergoing the body scan and receiving the instruction with positive expectation induction (EXPECT) compared to the group with a body scan and neutral instruction (NEUTRAL).

conclusionInducing positive treatment expectations may be beneficial for individuals with low baseline expectations, likely due to an enhanced placebo response. However, it may be counterproductive for individuals with high baseline outcome expectations and could reflect expectation violation effects.

Indexed as

AffectMindfulnessStress, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome ExpectationsPilot ProjectsPlacebo EffectSubjective StressTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultmindfulnessmoderatorplacebo effectstresstailored treatmenttreatment expectation

Identifiers

PMID42478332
PMCPMC13630349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.