ArticleCancer science2026
Epidemiological and Prognostic Differences in Malignant Mesothelioma Between Eastern China and SEER Database.
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eastern China malignant mesothelioma (MM) presents distinct features-younger age, female predominance, and moremalignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM)-contrasting with the Western profile of older males with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Robust survival data for this population are still unavailable. This retrospective study included 253 MM patients from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (2010-2024; 222 from Zhejiang Province, ZJ cohort) to update regional epidemiology and compare survival with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER). The ZJ cohort exhibited a younger median age at diagnosis (58 vs. 74 years), a higher proportion of females (62% vs. 24%), and a higher prevalence of MPeM (54% vs. 11%) relative to the SEER cohort. Overall survival (OS) was significantly prolonged in the ZJ cohort (median OS: 22 vs. 10 months), with survival benefits consistently observed across sex, age, and MPM subgroups. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed age as the only consistent independent prognostic factor in both ZJ and SEER cohorts. Following propensity score matching to minimize confounding, the ZJ cohort maintained a significantly longer survival in MPM but exhibited worse outcome in MPeM relative to SEER. Collectively, this study not only updated epidemiologic features for MM in Eastern China but also reported the unique survival patterns, uncovering inter-population heterogeneity. These findings emphasize the value of region-specific prognostic evidence and the limitations of directly applying Western data to Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.