ArticleParasites, hosts and diseases2026
Tick-borne bacterial pathogens in wildlife and their parasitizing ticks in Korea: A molecular epidemiological study.
Article in Parasites, hosts and diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ticks are important vectors of numerous zoonotic pathogens, yet integrated molecular surveillance of wildlife hosts and their parasitizing ticks remains limited in Korea. In this study, we investigated the occurrence of major tick-borne bacterial pathogens in wildlife and their associated ticks. Blood samples were collected from Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis), raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides), and wild boars (Sus scrofa), and a total of 246 ticks were obtained from these 34 animals. Molecular analyses identified multiple bacterial pathogens, including Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis, Bartonella schoenbuchensis, Rickettsia raoultii, Rickettsia monacensis, and Candidatus Rickettsia longicornii. Notably, E. canis was detected for the first time in blood samples from raccoon dogs and wild boars in Korea, and B. schoenbuchensis was identified in ticks for the first time in the country. In addition, R. monacensis exhibited a remarkably high minimum infection rate in Ixodes nipponensis, and all positive ticks were collected from raccoon dogs. Strikingly, Ca. R. longicornii was detected at a very high prevalence (94.1%) in wildlife blood samples, suggesting extensive circulation among wildlife hosts in the study area. These findings indicate that wildlife and their parasitic ticks may serve as important reservoirs of diverse tick-borne bacteria in Korea and highlight the importance of continuous molecular surveillance within a One Health framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.