Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477955›Full record

SynthesisJournal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology2026

Oral and Pancreatobiliary Microbiota in Cancer: A Systematic Review of Compositional Alterations and Their Clinical Implications.

Esperouz Fariba, Villani Rosanna, Ciavarella Domenico, Serviddio Gaetano, Lorusso Mauro, Lo Russo Lucio

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Esperouz FaribaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1820-899X
Villani RosannaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Internal Medicine, C.U.R.E. (University Centre for Liver Disease Research and Treatment), University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-019X
Ciavarella DomenicoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3114-6048
Serviddio GaetanoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6424-7841
Lorusso MauroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4382-5074
Lo Russo LucioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssociations between microbial dysbiosis and malignancies of the pancreatobiliary system have been described in recent studies. As a result of the limited number of studies that have been done specifically on the malignancies of the biliary tract, information regarding oral, biliary and tumour-related microbial alterations was combined to provide an overview of the microbial changes that may occur.

methodsStudies that involved observations on the composition or presence of dysbiosis of the microbiota from oral (saliva, oral rinse, dental plaque) or other non-oral specimens (bile, pancreatic tissue, duodenal tissue and bacteria-derived extracellular vesicles from plasma) in patients with pancreatobiliary malignancies were considered. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control study designs and the JBI Checklist for cross-sectional studies.

resultsThere were a total of 16 studies involving 1426 participants that were conducted using both case-control and cross-sectional study designs. Samples were collected from saliva, oral wash, bile, pancreatic and duodenal tissues and bacterial extracellular vesicles isolated from plasma samples. The most common method used was 16S rRNA sequencing, and two used shotgun metagenomics. In all the studies, patients with pancreatobiliary cancers, especially PDAC, had a significantly higher abundance of opportunistic microbes like Streptococcus, Veillonella, Fusobacterium, Prevotella and a lower abundance of commensal bacteria like Neisseria and Corynebacterium. There was overlap of microbial profile in the oral cavity and tumour/bile compartments in a few studies.

conclusionsAlthough the current data is preliminary and observational in nature, there are consistent findings linking microbiota dysbiosis with cancers of the pancreatobiliary region within both oral and non-oral body sites. Causality has not been established yet. The use of microbial signatures as a basis for biomarker development is a promising research direction.

Indexed as

DysbiosisMicrobiotaMouthPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsHumans16 rRNA gene sequencingoral microbiotapancreatobiliary cancers

Identifiers

PMID42477955
PMCPMC13635271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.