ReviewJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2026
Cerebrovascular reactivity delay measured by blood oxygen level dependent magnetic resonance imaging and gas challenges: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), a promising marker of neurovascular responsiveness, is commonly measured using blood-oxygenation-level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) during a vasoactive gas challenge. While CVR magnitude (vascular response strength) has been widely studied, CVR delay (response time) is comparatively underexplored yet may provide valuable insight into vascular dysfunction across several neurological conditions. We systematically reviewed publications assessing delay using gas-challenge BOLD-MRI up to October 2025, identifying 200 relevant papers. Only 44 (22%) papers investigated delay in detail; the remainder only applied delay correction to improve CVR magnitude accuracy. Findings in disease were mixed and often limited by small sample sizes and methodological differences. Hypercapnic stimuli, typically delivered via fixed-inspired or fixed-expired methods, were most commonly used. While cross-correlation was the most popular delay estimation method, several alternatives, including haemodynamic response function fitting and Fourier analysis, have been proposed, but systematic comparisons against standard delay estimation methods remain limited, especially in clinical populations. Our review highlights inconsistencies in delay measurement and interpretation, with delay mostly treated as a confounder rather than a meaningful physiological parameter. Greater methodological validation and harmonisation are needed to realise the potential of CVR delay as a novel biomarker of brain health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.