ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026
Supporting couples' perinatal sexual well-being: a feasibility study of the introductory modules of a novel prevention program (STORK).
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07036484 (Supporting Couples' Perinatal Sexual Well-being), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Supporting Couples' Perinatal Sexual Well-being: A Pilot Feasibility Study of the Introductory Modules of a Novel Prevention Program (STORK)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost new parents will experience changes to their sexual relationship during the perinatal period, yet no accessible prevention programs exist to support couples in navigating these changes. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of the introductory modules of an online couple-based program (STORK) designed to promote perinatal sexual well-being. The program is grounded in empirically established risk and protective factors associated with couples' perinatal sexual well-being.
methodsWe conducted a single-group feasibility study with eleven couples (22 individuals) expecting their first child (mean gestation 20 weeks). Couples completed the orientation and first STORK modules during a 2-h online session with a researcher. Participants then completed an online survey evaluating the program's feasibility and content. Qualitative semi-structured interviews and online questionnaires assessed participants' experiences with the platform, focusing on usability, acceptability, clarity, relevance, and overall satisfaction.
resultsParticipants reported high acceptability, rating both modules as clear and logical (mean = 5.6-5.9/7), enjoyable (mean = 4.7-6.1/7), helpful (mean = 5.0-5.7/7), and relevant (mean = 6.1/7). The platform was rated as easy to navigate (mean = 5.6/7) and highly inclusive (mean = 6.0-6.1/7). Most participants found the time commitment reasonable (95.5%), and 91% considered weekly completion with their partner feasible. Qualitative feedback highlighted usability, well-structured content, inclusivity, and support for personal and relationship reflection.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that the STORK program is a feasible and acceptable resource to support couples' perinatal sexual well-being, warranting further evaluation of its effectiveness. A pilot randomized controlled trial is warranted and may facilitate a shift toward couple-focused perinatal prevention programs. The STORK program has the potential to fill a critical gap in perinatal healthcare by providing an accessible, evidence-based prevention program to support couples navigating sexual changes during pregnancy and postpartum.
trial registrationThis feasibility study was prospectively registered on June 17, 2025 (reg #2023-6719), and the registration can be found here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07036484.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.