Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477797›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2026

Assessing the structure of mental health service networks in Belgium: implications for recovery-oriented systems of care.

Mégane Chantry, Jürgen Magerman, Ilse Goethals, Jessica De Maeyer, Wouter Vanderplasschen, Vincent Lorant, Pablo Nicaise

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mégane ChantryInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30 bt B1.30.15, Brussels, 1200, Belgium. megane.chantry@uclouvain.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3514-2779
Jürgen MagermanEQUALITY//Research Collective, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5568-4211
Ilse GoethalsEQUALITY//Research Collective, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2772-4132
Jessica De MaeyerEQUALITY//Research Collective, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-2085
Wouter VanderplasschenDepartment of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-4243
Vincent LorantInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30 bt B1.30.15, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2663-332X
Pablo NicaiseInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30 bt B1.30.15, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5637-5766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundService collaboration ensures care continuity and recovery-oriented care for individuals with mental disorders (MD). A recovery-oriented system of care (ROSC) encompasses diverse person-centred services that collaborate to address individual needs and foster social integration. We examined the characteristics of care provision for individuals with MD in Belgium with regard to ROSC principles. Specifically, we analysed the structure of collaboration within existing mental health service networks, focusing on the division between mental health services and specialised services for substance use disorders (SUD).

methodsWe conducted an online survey involving 309 services across five networks, of which 190 participated. We collected data on referrals and service characteristics. We used Social Network Analysis (SNA) to assess collaboration patterns within service networks, considering network density (i.e. number of ties), transitivity (i.e. tendency toward clustered collaboration), degree distribution (i.e. concentration of ties around certain services), service attributes (e.g. category, care function, and exclusion criteria), and homophily (i.e. tendency to connect with similar services). Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) was used to test whether observed collaboration patterns differed from random collaboration.

resultsHospital units and specialised SUD services were central services. Specialised SUD services and generic mental health services were more likely to collaborate with similar services. Likewise, services with the same care function were more likely to collaborate, except hospital units. Networks showed significant transitivity.

conclusionMental health service networks appear to be structured around organisational boundaries, with limited collaboration between complementary services and a highly hospital-centred configuration. These patterns suggest a misalignment with ROSC principles and may constrain the capacity of care systems to support recovery processes.

Indexed as

Care fragmentationERGMMental health servicesRecovery-oriented careService collaborationService networksSNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.