ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2026
Assessing the structure of mental health service networks in Belgium: implications for recovery-oriented systems of care.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundService collaboration ensures care continuity and recovery-oriented care for individuals with mental disorders (MD). A recovery-oriented system of care (ROSC) encompasses diverse person-centred services that collaborate to address individual needs and foster social integration. We examined the characteristics of care provision for individuals with MD in Belgium with regard to ROSC principles. Specifically, we analysed the structure of collaboration within existing mental health service networks, focusing on the division between mental health services and specialised services for substance use disorders (SUD).
methodsWe conducted an online survey involving 309 services across five networks, of which 190 participated. We collected data on referrals and service characteristics. We used Social Network Analysis (SNA) to assess collaboration patterns within service networks, considering network density (i.e. number of ties), transitivity (i.e. tendency toward clustered collaboration), degree distribution (i.e. concentration of ties around certain services), service attributes (e.g. category, care function, and exclusion criteria), and homophily (i.e. tendency to connect with similar services). Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) was used to test whether observed collaboration patterns differed from random collaboration.
resultsHospital units and specialised SUD services were central services. Specialised SUD services and generic mental health services were more likely to collaborate with similar services. Likewise, services with the same care function were more likely to collaborate, except hospital units. Networks showed significant transitivity.
conclusionMental health service networks appear to be structured around organisational boundaries, with limited collaboration between complementary services and a highly hospital-centred configuration. These patterns suggest a misalignment with ROSC principles and may constrain the capacity of care systems to support recovery processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42477797What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.