ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026
Cardiac effects of prolonged recombinant human interleukin-11 treatment in severe thrombocytopenia: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecombinant human interleukin-11 (rhIL-11) is commonly used to treat thrombocytopenia induced by cancer chemotherapy. However, concerns about its potential cardiac side effects, especially with prolonged use, warrant further investigation.
aimThis study aimed to evaluate the cardiac effects of prolonged rhIL-11 use by comparing changes in cardiac biomarkers and arrhythmia rates between rhIL-11 and recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in patients with severe thrombocytopenia.
methodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with rhIL-11 or rhTPO for ≥ 5 days between 2015 and 2021. Data were collected at baseline, during treatment, and after discontinuation, focusing on BNP levels and arrhythmia occurrences. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the outcomes between the two groups.
resultsOur study cohort comprised 23 patients treated with rhIL-11 and 7 patients receiving rhTPO. The rhIL-11 group showed a significant increase in serum BNP levels from a baseline median of 418 pg/mL (IQR: 193-1205) to 3084 pg/mL (IQR: 1446-5000) within one week (P < 0.01), while the rhTPO group had no significant changes (P = NS). BNP levels in the rhIL-11 group decreased to 384.0 pg/mL (IQR: 239.0-460.0) one week post-discontinuation (P < 0.05). Cardiac arrhythmias were documented in 34.8% (8/23) of rhIL-11-treated patients, demonstrating a clear treatment duration-dependent pattern: 83.3% (5/6) of patients receiving rhIL-11 for more than two weeks developed arrhythmias, with all 3 patients (100%) treated beyond three weeks experiencing cardiac complications, including two cases of frequent ventricular tachycardia. The rhTPO group showed no significant BNP changes or arrhythmic events. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a statistically significant divergence in arrhythmia risk profiles between the two treatment groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate COX regression analysis identified age as an independent risk factor for arrhythmia development (HR 1.071, 95% CI: 1.007-1.139; p = 0.029).
conclusionsProlonged rhIL-11 treatment was associated with significant elevations in BNP levels and a higher incidence of arrhythmias, particularly with longer treatment durations. These findings highlight the need for close cardiac monitoring in patients receiving extended rhIL-11 therapy. Further large-scale, prospective studies are necessary to establish clear cardiac safety guidelines for rhIL-11 use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.